Organizations have actually the Mic in the NAAG customer Protection Seminar

Breaking News

  • This week in a new blog post, Maria Colsey Heard and Ann-Marie Luciano discuss the National Association of Attorneys General (“NAAG”) 2016 Spring Consumer Protection Seminar, held in Washington, D.C. The event that is semi-annual customer security staff from AG workplaces around the world that are accountable for starting and performing investigations and litigations under states’ broad unjust and misleading trade techniques legislation.

Briefing by Cozen O’Connor’s State AG Practice Users

  • Cozen O’Connor’s State AG Practice customers Maria Colsey Heard and Sean Riley briefed attendees at an ongoing appropriate training occasion hosted by ALM, the publisher for the National Law Journal, The United states Lawyer, as well as other appropriate news sources. The briefing, en en en titled “State Attorneys General Investigations and Enforcement,” included all about resources of AG customer security authority, current AG actions within the regions of Medicaid fraud and privacy, and tips about how to handle it whenever an organization gets an AG subpoena.

2016 AG Elections

Cozen O’Connor’s State AG Practice Co-Hosts Teleconference regarding the 2016 AG Elections

  • Early in the day this week, Bernard Nash and Lori Kalani, Co-Chairs of Cozen O’Connor’s nationwide recognized State AG Practice, shared their insights and prognostications from the ten 2016 state AG elections (5 incumbents, 5 available seats), included in Cozen O’Connor Public ways’ series of briefings regarding the 2016 presidential election.
  • To listen to a recording associated with the briefing, view here.

Customer Financial Protection Bureau

Arkansas Attorney General Requests the CFPB Hold a Meeting About Recent Proposed Federal Rule Changes

  • Arkansas AG Leslie Rutledge delivered a page to your customer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) asking for that the agency hold a seminar regarding the states to go over the agency’s proposal for managing a range financial loans, including lines of credit, installment loans, deposit advances, automobile-title secured personal loans, and payday advances.
  • When you look at the page, AG Rutledge states that the CFPB proposition “ignores the passions for the states and seeks to impose a one-size-fits-all federal approach.” AG Rutledge writes that the proposed regulations would conflict with, constrict, and otherwise needlessly hinder current state customer security rules, lending criteria, licensing systems, and enforcement that is regulatory.
  • The page urges the CFPB to convene a seminar of this states to go over these problems prior to taking further action, asserting that the meeting for the states would offer a chance to talk about different state regulatory and enforcement systems, just just just what states have discovered from their very own efforts to guard customers, and just how prospective federal-state conflict may be prevented.

Customer Protection

California Attorney General Sues Computer Computer Computer Software Company for Allegedly Offering Prohibited Gambling Devices

  • Ca AG Kamala Harris filed a grievance against computer pc computer software provider Pong advertising & Promotions Inc. (“Pong”) for presumably breaking state unlawful and unjust competition regulations by participating in unlawful gambling.
  • In accordance with the AG’s office, Pong’s computer computer software presumably ended up being found in computer gambling products in “sweepstakes” cafes across the state, which, based on the AG’s workplace, run as mini-casinos. Following the Ca Supreme Court ruled that the products had been unlawful, Pong allegedly modified its computer computer software to ensure that users could redeem money rewards by executing the “skill” of pressing a mouse to cease a going cursor throughout a specified time frame. Generally speaking, games of ability are exempt from California’s gambling rules.
  • The AG’s grievance seeks injunctive relief and roughly ten dollars million in charges.

FTC Settles with Health Supplement Marketers for Allegedly Deceptive Adverts

  • The Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) reached money with Lunada Biomedical, Inc. and its own officers over allegations the organization violated the FTC Act by utilizing unsubstantiated claims to deceptively market a health supplement.
  • In line with the amended issue, Lunada presumably made unsubstantiated claims that supplement Amberan alleviates every typical manifestation of menopause and causes slimming down, and presumably additionally did not reveal consumer endorsers to their relationship and falsely reported high customer satisfaction and success prices.
  • Beneath the regards to the proposed stipulated purchase, Lunada must spend $250,000 of a suspended $40 million judgment, and it is forbidden from, among other activities, making claims that a health supplement treats certain apparent symptoms of menopause, causes losing weight, or treats any infection unless online payday loans Michigan they usually have peoples clinical assessment enough to substantiate such claims.

Texas Attorney General Reaches Payment with PayPal Over Privacy and Protection Disclosures

  • Texas AG Ken Paxton settled with PayPal, Inc. over allegations PayPal violated the Texas Deceptive Trade ways Act by failing continually to reveal to users of the mobile cash transfer application just exactly just how users’ private information will be utilized and provided.
  • In accordance with the AG’s workplace, PayPal’s money that is mobile application Venmo presumably utilized customers’ phone contacts without obviously disclosing the way the associates will be utilized, would not obviously reveal exactly just just exactly how consumers’ transactions and interactions along with other users will be provided, and misrepresented that communications from Venmo had been really off their Venmo users.
  • Beneath the regards to the settlement, PayPal decided to spend $175,000 towards the State of Texas and enhance its disclosures to customers privacy that is regarding safety.

Nyc Attorney General Sues Pizza Delivery Chain and its own Franchisees for Alleged Underpayment of Wages

  • Nyc AG Eric Schneiderman filed case against Domino’s Pizza, Inc., Domino’s Pizza LLC and Domino’s Pizza Franchising LLC (collectively, “Domino’s”), along with three Domino’s franchisees, over allegations which they violated state work legislation by underpaying pizza distribution employees.
  • Based on the petition, the three franchisees underpaid pizza delivery employees by failing woefully to spend the appropriate minimum wage and overtime prices, and failing woefully to acceptably reimburse workers with their distribution costs. In line with the AG’s workplace, the so-called underpayments had been mainly because of a pc system that Domino’s allegedly urged franchisees to utilize for payroll, which under-calculated gross wages.
  • The petition additionally alleges that Domino’s is in charge of the underpaid wages as being a joint manager associated with franchisee employees. In accordance with the AG’s Memorandum of Law meant for the petition, Domino’s is really a joint company because it exercised an “unusually higher level of control over worker conditions,” and played a task in resulting in the wage violations.


Ny Attorney General Settles with Diy Stores Over Alleged Violations of State Law Protecting Nyc Waters

  • Ny AG Eric Schneiderman joined into two split settlements aided by the Residence Depot, Inc. and Lowe’s Residence Centers, LLC to eliminate allegations they didn’t show lawn that is phosphorus-containing in a way needed by state legislation.
  • brand brand New York’s Nutrient Runoff Law, designed to reduce water air air air pollution due to extra phosphorus running off yards into ny waters, requires merchants to show yard fertilizers containing phosphorous individually from those who are phosphorus-free, also to create signs that notify consumers concerning the appropriate restrictions on making use of lawn fertilizer that is phosphorus-containing. In line with the AG’s workplace, Home Depot and Lowe’s had been commingling phosphorous-containing fertilizers with phosphorus-free fertilizers inside their shows and failing woefully to show the signage that is required breach of state legislation.
  • In line with the settlements, Residence Depot will probably pay $78,000 and Lowe’s can pay $52,000 in charges to ny State. The settlements further require both merchants to create their shops in nyc into complete conformity using the Nutrient Runoff Law.
  • In-may 2015 the AG reached funds with Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. involving comparable allegations.

Leave a Reply